What mid evil people looked liked
Well, whether it was unavailable for the first day or first couple of centuries of the middle ages is not really important for the general claim that medieval people had it. Especially since the author already covered what e. Romans did pre-soap or rather, in lieu of soap, as soap was available in the empire, but not preferred by Romans until towards the end.
I think the Germans and Gauls were making and using soap before the Romans showed up. And eventually Romans were using it too. Would seem to follow that medieval people would find soap to be unremarkable. Minor nit: Soap is not a medieval invention. It has been around since ancient Egypt. The Aleppo and Castile soap connection is mentioned in the article.
What a Medieval Bed Should Look Like - deftcryphabtrol.tk
MarcScott 3 months ago. I don't know much about the medieval periods, but in the 16th century, people certainly didn't bath very often. They tended to wear fresh linen everyday, which did a remarkable job of cleaning the skin of dirt and sweat, then washed their clothes regularly. Who determined the "lack of significant body odour"? How was it measured?
Join others and have our posts delivered to you by email.
What's the threshold? Was there a control group? Was the experiment repeated at several times of the year? Darkphibre 3 months ago. This is a rather blanket claim. My step-dad grew up in crazy-rural Oregon. His dad refused to take a bath more than twice a year. Those long-johns with a trap door stayed on a looong time during the winters. They were still using an outhouse. I kind of feel like there's plenty of modern examples in which regular bathing is not a priority or even an advantage, given the lack of warm water during the winter. Did he live there during medieval times? The post is about a specific era, and the prevalent norms, not about absolutely everybody at any era or even absolutely everybody at the era it concerns, for that matter.
It's about statistics what most did not physical laws what everybody absolutely had to follow.
Realm of History
Does "taking a bath" in English include showering? I didn't take a bath for at least a year, only showers and quickly washing my armpits with soap in washhand basin. So did the wife just tolerate the smell during sex? Was there no sex? Just seems so unhygienic for intimacy. There is a running-gag in the gay community "a guy with an unwashed ass" which is used for straight guys.
Also, many women told me that they were in love with guys with bad hygiene, some of them never washing between their cheeks because "nothing goes between my ass cheeks, that's gay shit! Memes aside Sex has weird and sometimes offensive smells. This holds true for queer folks, straight folks, and even folks with good hygiene. I feel like most sexually active adults already know this. You aren't always going to get a shower and a toothbrush just prior to bumping uglies. Body odors are one thing. Not having showered for weeks is another.
Maybe, when everyone stinks you'd get used to it and think nothing of it? Doubl 3 months ago. I once spent a summer working in the equivalent of a knacker's yard.
What a Medieval Bed Should Look Like
The first day or two there the smell was appalling but it got to the stage where I no longer noticed it. People away from work noticed me though! Sex has no smell most of the time. I found the condom to be the culprit. Your bodily fluids have a smell. Maybe you can't smell them, but other people can. Straight guy here. Many people in the modern world don't. But taking that a step further and not even washing your ass while showering is just foul.
I have to wonder if body odour ramps up exponentially for the first few days of not bathing, but then fades into a less nauseating background musk after powering through the initial spike. Maybe skin flora eventually stabilize toward a less offensive culture? There's theories out there that bacteria that oxidizes ammonia would have been pretty common. Before treated water and daily soaping. Anecdotal, but I worked with a guy who didn't bathe due to religious reasons. What religion would that be? Bumism, orthodox. The Google Image Search results for "Bumism" are pretty hilarious.
I suspect at those times everyone reeked relative to today, but they just didn't have anything better to compare to. It's funny that nowadays we look at images in churches, old books, and other old buildings to deduce what medieval people did. What will people use in years to deduce what we did?
Will they use social media selfies? Or will those have disappeared? This seriously worries me. Every generation thinks that what they do is disposable and not worth preserving. Source code from even just 20 years ago discarded and lost, priceless and one of a kind computer systems thrown into the sea, old movies and books completely lost. While nothing has really changed in regards to the value current generations place on current production, what has changed it seems is our ability to rediscover these lost artifacts.
Newly printed books will rot away in a century or two, the memories and data we keep on company servers will be thrown away either on purpose or by accident just look at myspace or be otherwise inaccessible. No longer will our kids be able to find old pictures of their dad or an old diary from when we were young.
It would be really cool if such a technology exist that you could write data once on to some chip or piece of glass or whatever that you could read again and again forever. We've got a lot more than that for medieval Europe - archaeological remains of more commonplace objects, business and administrative records oh lord the things you can learn from an inventory sheet or an invoice , etc. Not necessarily.
- free vehicle history and vin!
- Middle Ages | Definition & Facts | deftcryphabtrol.tk;
- Join others and have our posts delivered to you by email.?
- Subscribe to our newsletter?
- desk top backgrounds for computers com?
- Castle Staff!
The vast majority of recording media we have are not nearly as robust as stone or vellum. Not much outside of archival paper will survive. While that's true, the vast majority of things we record are not worth keeping for long time frames. There's still a lot of stuff that gets printed on metals, stones, archival media, etc.
Not to mention we have modern archival methods that didn't exist back then. Barring a simultaneous complete and total collapse of all civilizations on Earth, we'll still be passing vastly more information on to future generations than previous generations ever did. Also note that what's worth keeping vs what's unimportant might change over time.
Bach and Vivaldi only became famous after their death. I don't say that everything should be preserved forever, just that it's kept in mind. Right now, Spotify and Apple Music and Google Play are holding on to recordings, in hundreds of replicas, of garage bands who've only been heard by people in their whole history. If one of those services goes out of businesses, there are others. Archivists like the Library of Congress use in-house solutions comparable to S3 Glacier or Google Archival Storage, where use of longer-lived media and copying to new media is cheap enough to preserve fantastic amounts of information.
A caveat - though the risk of losing art due to loss or destruction of physical media is lower than ever, we still have to contend with intentional destruction of copies by the creator, for business or security reasons. Designed to withstand 70s nuclear war scenarios, among other things. Stores about 1 billion 35 mm images at the moment. Those business and administrative records were kept on paper which lives for a long time. Now they are transitioning to computers and while it's easy to store all business transactions of a business on an usb-stick, that usb-stick, and basically any digital storage medium we have now, deteriorates over time and will become unreadable in a matter of decades.
There is research on digital storage mediums that have archival capabilities. I hope that they will become cheap enough to get into widespread use. Note though that claims for archival capabilities and actually having archival capabilities are different things. We might wake up one day, realizing that the technology we used to store data for the long term actually deteriorated more quickly than we thought, with tons of stuff lost.
The only way to combat that is to use multiple different technologies.
I think there would have to be an apocalyptic event to cause knowledge about significant events, people, and ideas to be lost. It's not always clear what data will be significant in the future, and we don't want the memory of the present to be inordinately selected by those who can afford server upkeep. I often think that maybe in a years or so, archeologists will find evidence that almost every household had a copy of Harry Potter or something similar and will conclude that this was a widespread religion at the time.